Tips for Choosing RAM for Sandy Bridge Chips: Don't Swing Your Hands

This guide covers tips for choosing RAM for sandy bridge chips: don't swing your hands with practical context and easy-to-follow details. Use it to understand the subject and apply the information confidently.

Join us to choose the most difficult components for a PC.

>>> Tips To speed up your computer

Choose RAM for Your Computer: Is It More Expensive to Increase

Huge RAM kit with both heat sink attached.

The Parameters of RAM

Sandy Bridge RAM Controller: Better RAM Exploitation

As we all know, parts such as RAM controllers, integrated graphics cores. Are now on the same semiconductor with L3 cache cache and processor cores, connected through the device. The ring bus structure along with the link bandwidth between them is significantly increased. Thus, in addition to integrated graphics performance, data read and write speeds on RAM are higher than Clarkdale and Lynnfield (Core i3, i5 and i7 socket 1156 generations).

It also means that high bandwidth and low latency will significantly affect the performance of Sandy Bridge platform system compared to the old Core-i generation.

Table Supports RAM Clock

The table above provides information on RAM clock speeds that older Sandy Bridge and Core-i processors support. As you can see, the old socket 1156 processor like the i7 870 only supports up to 1600 MHz, i3 and i5 even supports only 1333 MHz. This means if you hastily carry a kit of RAM with 1600 MHz To plug into your i5 760 system, you will be forced to overclock the processor to run the correct RAM bandwidth. Very cumbersome!

Test Configuration && Setup

The system uses Core i5-2500K processor. Tests will be carried out at default pulses of 3. 3 GHz and 4. 7 GHz with 10 kit RAM from affordable to super-powerful.

CPU: Intel Core i5-2500K (Sandy Bridge, 4 cores, 3. 3 GHz, 6 MB L3);

Mainboard: ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (LGA1155, Intel P67 Express);

Graphics card: ATI Radeon HD 6970.

Hard drive: Kingston SNVP325-S2 / 128GB.

Power supply unit: Tagan TG880-U33II (880 W). Operating system: Microsoft Windows 7 SP1 Ultimate x64.

Memory:

DDR3-1066 CL7 (7-7-7-21-1T);

DDR3-1333 CL9 (9-9-9-27-1T);

DDR3-1333 CL7 (7-7-7-21-1T);

DDR3-1600 CL9 (9-9-9-27-1T);

DDR3-1600 CL8 (8-8-8-24-1T);

DDR3-1600 CL7 (7-7-7-21-1T);

DDR3-1866 CL9 (9-9-9-27-1T);

DDR3-1866 CL8 (8-8-8-24-1T);

DDR3-2133 CL10 (10-10-10-30-1T); DDR3-2133 CL9 (9-9-9-27-1T).

Some Apps

The first is WinRar - an indispensable extracting app in any computer. We proceed to extract files with 1. 1 GB capacity and measure the time:

WinRar is clearly a testament to the impact of clock and latency on system-wide performance. It seems that kit RAM 1600 has the highest investment value when it outperforms the 1067 and 1333 kit, but is not inferior to the 2133 kit 'terrible' price.

Other popular apps such as Photoshop, video encode and render videos hardly take advantage of the high bandwidth and low latency advantages, just like the '10-ton payload vehicle carrying 1 ton of goods' we mentioned. Out. Conversely, clock speeds increase dramatically.

Game Performance

Game performance is not only a matter of most user interest today, but also a group of apps that closely monitor hardware. To clarify the issue we are concerned about is the effect of RAM on system performance, we choose tests that require heavy CPU activity, and do not set the highest graphics setting to avoid VGA situations. Depletion affects results.

5% is the biggest difference we get from 2133 RAM kit compared to 1067 juniors (only half the price) in 2 performance tests for CPU calculation and graphics processing performance.

In contrast, physical tasks (requiring multiple parallel processing) seem to be thirsty for more RAM. However, the 4 RAM modules of 1866 and 2133 also show clear advantages compared to the mid-range 1600 kit when overclocking the processor to a very high 4. 7 GHz.

Obviously the speed of RAM is something gamers need to keep an eye on when building a gaming system. Of course, the result depends on each case, but in general, a low RAM kit will pull back the system performance by a considerable amount, while too "terrible" does not increase performance.

Conclude

Summarizing the tests, it seems that a kit RAM 1600 cas 9 is a reasonable choice to balance performance and cost, especially for non-K (non-overclocking) processors. Up to the very high overclocked 2500K or 2600K processors, the higher-end RAM kit will take effect, but at the moment there is a cost problem. On the other side, a 1333 RAM kit proved completely unsuitable for your Sandy Bridge system. In general, the article only provides test results for reference readers. Depending on your processor, user intentions and wallet, consider choosing the most suitable RAM for your system, avoiding performance bottlenecks, but don't waste too much money. For 1-2 FPS.