Comparing BlueStacks and NoxPlayer, which software is better?

In the list of best android emulators, BlueStack and NoxPlayer are the names that attract the most attention. Let's analyze about these two software in the following article to see which software is worth installing Android emulator on our device!

Comparing BlueStacks and NoxPlayer, which software is better? Picture 1

If you want to download BlueStacks and NoxPlayer software , please download at the link below.

BlueStacks : https://www.bluestacks.com/en/index.html

NoxPlayer : https://www.bignox.com/

1. Minimum configuration of NoxPlayer and BlueStacks

BlueStacks

NoxPlayer

OS

Windows 7 and above

Windows XP SP3, Windows 7 and above

CPU

Intel or AMD

Intel or AMD with 2 or more cores

RAM

Minimum 2GB

1.5GB

HDD

Minimum of 5GB

Minimum of 2.5GB free

2. Compare capacity before and after installation

The following is a comparative image of the pre and post capacity level of BlueStacks and NoxPlayer.

Comparing BlueStacks and NoxPlayer, which software is better? Picture 2

Downloadable installer capacity from home page (left is BlueStacks and right is NoxPlayer)

Comparing BlueStacks and NoxPlayer, which software is better? Picture 3

After installation (the left is the NoxPlayer folder and the right is the BlueStacks folder)

In addition, BlueStacks software also has data folder located at C: ProgramData with quite high capacity, ranging from 4 - 5 GB.

Comparing BlueStacks and NoxPlayer, which software is better? Picture 4

3. The interface of the application

The interface of the two software is designed quite differently. The interface on NoxPlayer is built in the direction of the original Android interface while the interface on BlueStacks is built and optimized according to user experience.

Comparing BlueStacks and NoxPlayer, which software is better? Picture 5

Interface on NoxPlayer

Comparing BlueStacks and NoxPlayer, which software is better? Picture 6

Interface on BlueStacks

4. Time to start and close the application

To measure the time to start and close the application, I ran two software via VMWare virtual machine with the following configuration:

OS: Windows 10 Pro 64bit

CPU: Core i3 8100 (4 cores 4 threads)

RAM: 4GB

VGA: VMWare SVGA 3D

Comparing BlueStacks and NoxPlayer, which software is better? Picture 7

And the time I measured is as follows (from the time the application opens and the home screen loads)

BlueStacks Software.

Warm up time: 55 seconds.
Application shutdown time: 11 seconds.

Comparing BlueStacks and NoxPlayer, which software is better? Picture 8

NoxPlayer software

Boot time: 30 seconds
Application closing time: 1 second.

Comparing BlueStacks and NoxPlayer, which software is better? Picture 9

Note: The time it takes to start up quickly or slowly depends on your PC configuration. Data in the article is for reference only and conform to the machine configuration in the article.

5. System resource consumption

In my test, I took the Subway Surfer game as an example and configured the hardware for two applications: 2 core CPU with 1000MB RAM. The results measured by Task Manager are as follows:

Comparing BlueStacks and NoxPlayer, which software is better? Picture 10

BlueStacks RAM and CPU consumption

Comparing BlueStacks and NoxPlayer, which software is better? Picture 11

NoxPlayer RAM and CPU consumption

Through two comparison images, we can see that NoxPlayer consumes more resources (RAM, CPU). In the process of running the application, NoxPlayer sometimes generates graphics errors and lag occurs. BlueStacks occasionally chooses frames but still works fine on low-profile devices.

6. Special features

Comparing BlueStacks and NoxPlayer, which software is better? Picture 12

MOBA mode on BlueStacks is one of the bright features to help players of MOBA games like Mobile Union, Legend Of Ace . on the simulator easier thanks to the application's available button settings. At this point, NoxPlayer does not yet support but we can still play MOBA games with NoxPlayer but it must be customized manually and take a bit of time to set up.

7. Summary

Here, TipsMake.com summarizes and compares the differences on BlueStacks and NoxPlayer. The test configuration in the article is CPU Core i3 8100, 4GB RAM and SVGA 3D graphics memory on VMWare virtual machine.

BlueStacks

NoxPlayer

Installer capacity from the homepage

963 KB

377 MB

Capacity after installation

109 MB + 5.29 GB Data

1.29 GB

Warm-up time

55 seconds

30 seconds

Multitasking

Good

medium

Automation

Have

Is not

Resource consumption

Medium

High

Support Live Stream on Twitch

Have

Is not

Gaming experience

Smooth, stable FPS, with lag phenomenon on low-profile machines.

Graphics error occurs on low-profile devices, occasionally reducing FPS when playing heavy graphics games.

Experience the normal application

Normally, there is a lag when moving on the main menu on low-profile devices

Smooth, no lag, stutter even on low-profile devices.

BlueStacks and NoxPlayer are two good candidates for the best Android emulator on PC. Through the above test, you can choose for yourself which application is suitable. If you own a PC with a good configuration, BlueStacks is the best software because of its hardware optimization and good support for gaming emulators. And your PC has a modest configuration with a RAM of less than 4GB, NoxPlayer will help you have a smoother and lighter experience. Good luck!