Clear, practical technology insights BSOD Code Lookup · Windows Error Code Lookup · Wi-Fi Troubleshooting · PC Troubleshooting Checklist

Microsoft Removed 1500 Junk Apps on the Windows Store

Microsoft has bluntly removed junk, fake or deceptive apps, misleading users from their Windows Store. See how it works and what to consider before using it.

Table of Contents

This article explores Microsoft removed 1500 junk apps on the Windows store with straightforward explanations and useful context. It also highlights common questions and important details to consider.

Microsoft Removed 1500 Junk Apps on the Windows Store illustration

How Microsoft Removed 1500 Junk Apps on the Windows Store Works

After admitting that Windows Store has many applications that deceive users as we reported earlier, Microsoft has started to "purify" its Products by removing more than 1500 garbage applications, and said it will. Refunds for those who "accidentally" Bought wrongly.

In addition, Microsoft has just issued a new policy for developers to put applications on the Windows Store including:

  • Name: Must be clear, accurate, properly describe the functions of the app.
  • Category: Must have a reasonable and functional list, purpose of use to help users find easily.
  • Icon: Must be specific and not be confused with other application icons.

This new policy will apply to both Windows Store and Windows Phone Store.

FAQ

What is the main benefit of Microsoft removed 1500 junk apps on the Windows store?

The main benefit is a clearer understanding of the topic and a practical way to apply the information covered in this guide.

What should I check before using Microsoft removed 1500 junk apps on the Windows store?

Confirm compatibility, review the required settings, protect important data, and use the latest supported version whenever possible.

What should I do if the result is different?

Repeat the steps carefully, verify permissions and version differences, and consult the product's official support documentation for changes not shown in the article.

Discussion

Reader Comments 0

Sign in with email or Google to join the discussion.