AMD opposes Intel bias in benchmark results
Nvidia and AMD expressed their opposition to SYSMark 2012 results by withdrawing from the computer benchmark group established by BAPCo.
Nvidia and AMD expressed their opposition to SYSMark 2012 results by withdrawing from the computer benchmark group established by BAPCo.
AMD thinks that the benchmark results released by SYSMark 2012 are Intel biased. (Photo: Microextra).
Computer benchmarks are an important method to compare performance between PCs.
SYSMark 2012 is one of the most popular benchmark software versions of BAPCo. The company has partnered with many software vendors and chip makers to create a testing process that evaluates the real performance of computers.
However, recently Nvidia and AMD have left this group because the new software does not take into account the parallel processing performance of the GPU graphics processor.
The combination of performance between CPU and GPU makes the difference between AMD and Intel. AMD technology allows computers to use both integrated GPUs and discrete graphics cards for processing at the same time.
Therefore, the company believes that the SYSMark 2012 system biases its competitors because it focuses on each CPU processing capability. Nvidia has no comment on its departure.
In addition to AMD and Nvidia, the benchmark alliance has names such as Microsoft, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Lenovo, Samsung, Sony and even Intel.
- The benchmark of i7-9700K chip also surpassed the multi-core Intel Core i7-8700K and AMD Ryzen 7 2700X chips
- Benchmarking route of Coffee Lake - 8th generation Intel chip
- See the benchmark of the extremely rare Intel Core i9-9990XE CPU, only auctioned to OEM
- Intel i7-9700K chip reaches 5.5Ghz speed on all 8 cores, with water cooled
- 5 cognitive biases prevent you from making the right decision
- Core i7-10700KF revealed benchmark score, as strong as Ryzen 7 3800X but doubled power consumption