Can connect, and
Allow any client to access.
The first point is nothing difficult to understand, it means that anything you post must have a URL to point back to . But the complexity is not in the link but in that it must allow any client to access. With the website, this rule is very clear, whether you use Chrome, Safari, Edge or Opera, just click or type the URL, you will reach the address you need. Although built by web standards and W3C, but gradually, problems arise when a browser becomes too popular and the company behind it will ask web developers to program their browsers separately ( Internet Explorer 6, Mobile Safari or Chrome). But this problem will gradually be solved.
When talking about "open web", anyone can access it is a core issue. A website or application can be free and linkable but if it only works on certain platforms (iOS, Android, Facebook, Chrome) then it is not really open anymore.
Now you can look through everything and check the above two factors, whether it is considered part of the open web or not.Android Instant Apps only works on Android. Facebook Instant Articles and Apple News (ignoring odd URLs redirection) only work on their platform. All are not web.
Maybe this is a little confusing, especially with Instant Articles or AMP. Especially AMP when it is built on the HTML group that created the web. Any normal web browser can view an AMP page, but this is due to Google's "hugeness", who define what can and cannot run on AMP and hence limit it. at the level they want.
Why is this question important? The openness of the web allows small companies to become big companies without permission from the big guys. Web protection, or its openness, means protecting a path for inventions, where big men don't stand guard. There is also a reason for me not to believe the big guys because there will be no motivation to encourage openness when you have the empire in hand.
See more: