When SpaceX and its competitors compete to become dominant orbitals, they will have to cut costs to race, along with the pressure to speed up development and production.This makes fields like security less likely to be cut and less invested.
Even for companies with high security technologies, the costs associated with securing each component may not be preferred.This problem is even more serious for low-cost space missions, as the amount invested in cybersecurity can exceed the cost of the satellite itself.
If a satellite is managed by multiple companies, then the responsibility of the stakeholders will be very vague.This lack of clarity will create heartless psychology and hinder efforts in ensuring network security.
Required rules are required
A number of analysts have begun to support the government's strong involvement in the development and adjustment of network security standards for satellites and other assets in space.
Congress can pass a comprehensive legal framework for 'space trade'.For example, they could pass laws requiring satellite manufacturers to develop a common network security architecture.
Congress can also manage reports on all incidents of satellite network security breaches.And the need to give extra priority to keeping satellites in orbit.
The United States has established space forces: Space Force.
In addition, companies should be held accountable in their fight against hackers, which will be essential for them to take measures to enhance the security of their systems.
Before these problems can be solved, we can only hope that there will not be another attack on orbiting satellites, the security of cyberspace is very much dependent on the security of the network. Internet hovering in space.