Apple sued for eavesdropping on users, must pay $95 million in compensation
Apple has agreed to pay $95 million to settle a class-action lawsuit in which a group of plaintiffs alleged the company violated users' privacy with its Siri voice recordings. The data was used to improve Siri, or shared with third-party advertisers for targeted advertising.
The lawsuit, filed in 2019, alleges that Apple illegally stored data on users' interactions with its virtual assistant Siri without explicit consent and shared that data with third-party contractors, including advertisers. According to a report from The Guardian, these recordings included a wide range of sensitive personal data, including medical information, business transactions, and even users' personal relationships.
The lawsuit also argues that Apple failed to adequately inform users about the extent to which Siri audio recordings are collected and used. Notably, while Siri can be activated with a wake word like 'Hey Siri' or by holding down the side button on an iPhone, the lawsuit claims that the virtual assistant also passively listens to users' conversations and records snippets when it is accidentally activated.
For its part, Apple has said that all Siri recordings are anonymized and used only to improve the performance of its virtual assistant. However, the lawsuit argues that this explanation is inadequate, and that users should have a clear choice to allow or deny Siri the recording.
After more than five years in court, lawyers for both sides sat down for talks in October 2024. Apple apologized, suspended its Siri grading program, and made a series of changes, including no longer keeping recordings by default. The company also allowed users to opt out of sharing their Siri recordings and delete existing recordings.
In addition, Apple has agreed to pay compensation to users who may have been affected by Siri's data collection practices. According to Reuters, individual users could receive up to $20 for each Siri-enabled device they own. Tens of millions of consumers who owned iPhones and other Apple devices between September 17, 2014 and the end of 2024 can file claims for compensation.
The Siri privacy lawsuit is a continued reminder of the importance of transparency for tech companies. Users have a right to fully understand what data is being collected and how it is being used. The lawsuit also highlights the need for greater user control over data collection by virtual assistants. As virtual assistants become more integrated into our daily lives, ensuring user privacy will remain a critical issue.
You should read it
- Do you know why the virtual assistant on the iPhone is called Siri?
- This is how Siri and Google Assistant help you in dangerous situations
- The 'critical' answers of Siri, the funny assistant on iOS
- How to Enable Siri
- Good features with Siri on Mac
- How to Use Siri on a Mac
- How to turn off Siri on iPhone, iPad
- Microsoft uploaded the video 'complaining' Siri
May be interested
- Is Google Chrome eavesdropping on you?it is important to check what google chrome is doing in the background and determine if it is monitoring your activities.
- Record videos to report iPhone bugs, accidentally discovering evidence that Facebook Messenger is eavesdropping on users?proof of facebook messenger is eavesdropping on users due to the mapuanclem guy accidentally discovering in the video that his iphone x crashed controversially.
- Apple has been sued collectively because the iPhone XR has poor receptionapple has repeatedly encountered class action lawsuits from iphone users.
- Unexpectedly detected, the smartphone is not secretly 'eavesdropping' but 'peeking' the user screensome android applications can take pictures and rotate screens and send them to the remote server without the user granting permission for this action.
- Apple won Samsung, winning $ 120 million from the Slide-to-unlock patentwho knows that such a simple operation is worth so much money?
- Ptracker eavesdropping software comes from Chinaptracker is a software product originating from china, then developed by viet hong employees.
- Chrome incognito mode is not 'secret', each user can get $ 5,000 compensationthe initial notice in incognito windows google chrome always states that the user's activity will still be visible to the website administrator and some other parties. so what basis for google to be sued this time?
- Two college students allegedly cheated nearly $ 1 million of Appletwo chinese students currently studying engineering at a number of universities in oregon, usa, have recently been accused of behind a fraudulent deal worth nearly $ 1 million. via apple's iphone replacement campaign
- CEO Tim Cook has 'pocketed' more than $ 15 million in 2018 - 283 times more than the average salary of an Apple employee in a year.according to sec statistics, the last 12 months were a relatively successful time for apple leaders when he earned more than $ 15 million.
- PUBG officially filed a lawsuit against Free Fire, asking Garena to stop doing business immediatelyrecently, developer krafton - the father of pubg game, filed a lawsuit against garena - the developer of two games free fire and free fire max. krafton accused the two titles of blatantly copying their survival shooter pubg: battlegrounds.