The test method is simple: JBRhine will face down the cards and ask participants to guess which cards in a group are decorated. For each group of cards, the experimenter will have a 1/5 chance to guess correctly. Each correct answer will be awarded 1 point. 5/25 points will be the level of random guessing, or in other words, if guessing randomly, the participant will win 5 points. According to him, with such high precision and rigor, these experiments will give accurate results, preventing any fraud.
The scientific community was surprised, largely skeptical of the results that this scientist made in the results of his 'Psychic Ability' report. According to the results he obtained, most of the participants passed the threshold of 5 points. The method of implementation and the results of this scientist are still controversial.
However, no one can deny his great contributions to the science of human telepathy. After Rhine performed this experiment, many scientists also embarked on many similar experiments using the Zener deck. Not only that, they also got the same positive results as Rhine. Later on, the Zener deck was replaced by pictures of various textures, paintings or photographs.
The experimental method is also more complicated. A participant will be tasked with focusing mentally on a certain photo, then trying to connect the details in the image with another isolated object outside the image. The role of psychics is to try to capture the images or information that the other person is thinking about, and then tell scientists what they see in their heads. At the end of this process, the person will gather all that they see and come to a final conclusion about what the other person was thinking.
Another type of experiment was conducted in the 1970s. The psychic would be blindfolded and brought into a room with only a dim red image. The scientists would then send a person into that room. The task of the psychic is to describe and provide information about the object that has just been brought into the room. Many psychics are unable to produce results, but conversely, there are many who describe information with surprising accuracy and detail. However, because there are many manifestations of extrasensory abilities, researchers also offer different types of experiments. For example, when testing for clairvoyance - the ability to see objects elsewhere that cannot be seen by the naked eye, one only needs to test the psychic without the need for a second person to be involved in the process. test like telepathy.
However, the results obtained are still limited and require the machine to be designed very sophisticatedly and with high accuracy. Scientists who study spirituality have given many examples of extrasensory abilities. However, many skeptics remain unsatisfied with the evidence. In the next section, we'll take a closer look at the views that opponents of telepathy make.
Despite the overwhelming amount of convincing evidence of psychic abilities over the past 100 years, opponents are adamant that the evidence is unreliable and, therefore, underweight. to prove something. The reason these people give is very simple, it is because these evidences do not match the scientific results that people have found. These examples do not conform to the laws of nature. According to these people, if we take a holistic view of human society with so many important events happening every day, we will understand why some people have accurate dreams about their future. me.
The vast world with more than 7 billion people has witnessed many different stories and events. Throughout a person's life, they will inevitably encounter events that they have imagined or heard about before. That's why so many people believe in psychic abilities.
The chances of many people experiencing premonition dreams like these are even higher if the person has a solid knowledge of the field in which they predict. Invite readers to return to the story of the two ships Titanic and Titan mentioned above. Readers will no longer feel strange knowing that the author Morgan Robertson was once a sailor. He has a very good understanding of how ships work, the risk of ship crashes and possible consequences. Another explanation is that many people have better intuition than the rest.
They also use the same five senses as normal people, however, the way they use their brains to process information is on a higher level. Therefore, the judgments they make are also more accurate. For example, you can tell if a person is lying or not based on their tone of voice, gestures, or facial expressions.
Those who believe in psychic abilities object to the above reasons. In fact, many psychics have never experienced the predictions they make. Only a handful of predictions are relevant to the psychic's real life. But there are many dreams and omens that are not related to the real life of psychics, how will the opponents interpret. Not only that, many of the studies that scientists do are also on the side of those who believe in psychic abilities.
In response to these arguments, those who oppose the existence of psychic abilities have vehemently vetoed the results of psychic scientists.
No matter what the science says, certain people do find benefits of using a psychic, both in person and online.
Psychic readers help find answers to different issues regarding their love life, career, finances and even relationships with pets. If a person does happen to choose to get a psychic reading the important thing is to put in the time and research into finding a legitimate one.
According to opponents, we cannot fully trust the research results yet. Many external factors can influence these results. Going back to JB Rhine's experiment that we mentioned above, when performing the experiment, it is possible that the psychics guessed the right card by looking at Rhine's body gestures. It is also possible that Rhine already knew the cards and used eye contact to inform the study participants.
Rhine himself later admitted that his method of study was still not absolutely rigorous and the accuracy of the results also decreased. The biggest problem with these experiments is that they are not universally applicable to all psychics. In other words, if two scientists use the same research method but apply it to different psychics, it is likely that their results will also be different. That's because each psychic reaches a different level of telepathy and their psychic abilities are also in different forms. Therefore, we cannot confirm the accuracy of the experiments performed.
Many people also believe that the scientific results obtained are unreliable. It is possible that scientists have created these results themselves to support their theories (this has happened with many other sciences). Even honest scientists themselves take a long time to prove their scientific results.
Accusing scientists is a very serious matter, however, those who oppose the existence of telepathy still use this argument. Many are also opposed to live telepathic programs. They try to point out the frauds in these programs. Today, with modern science and technology, creating illusions that deceive the human eye is no longer a difficult thing.
One of the most common methods of fraud is the allusion of relevant facts. To do this, the false psychic will quickly point out something that the listener believes is real. Although this feature is very common, for a short time listeners cannot detect that they have been tricked.
Give an example as follows, the false psychic will assert:
I'm talking to a person in your house whose name starts with H, try to remember if anyone in your house has that name?…
This is the most basic example of this implied method. The psychic only talks around a problem, and then the listener will infer on himself to find the correct one. In other words, it was the blind faith of the listeners that protected the psychics. This is an old but still blinding trick that is believed by quite a few gullible people and is the benefit of using spiritual means.
Many scientists believe that the views expressed by opponents of the existence of psychic abilities are very beneficial to the public. It is the way they argue against the existence of telepathy that helps the public to have a more thorough and fair view of the existing supernatural phenomena.
One of the leaders in the movement against the existence of telepathy was magician James Randi. He has held seminars on emotional reactions and provided data analysis to explain strange phenomena. He is also the one who announced that he would give $1 million to anyone who could prove the existence of psychic abilities.
But the whole process must be closely monitored and tested for reliability. However, to date, no one has won this 1 million USD - this is also one of the reasons for James Randi to veto the existence of telepathy. Some people claimed to be psychics and took part in this challenge, but the only result they received was their reputation being reduced because of their failure to pass the test.
However, in the opinion of many experts, the reason they come up with research results is because of science. They did not participate in James Randi's challenge, because the purpose of science is truth, not money. Those who deny the role of science and blindly associate human psychic abilities with visual distractions have unwittingly hindered the process of uncovering mysteries that contemporary science has not yet solved. likes to float.
After a lot of discussion and controversy, at present we still cannot confirm the existence of psychic abilities. Everyone has their own reasons to justify their point of view. In human history, we have witnessed many phenomena that scientists have to consider, turn over and over and over again to be able to draw a final conclusion. Hopefully, in the not too distant future, humans can explain the supernatural phenomena that still exist.