For about a month and a half now, I've been using Claude Cowork almost every day. And, not coincidentally, this has been the most productive period I've ever been. Switching to working with AI agents is a huge change—so much so that you can hardly understand it without experiencing it firsthand.
Let's take a simple example. I have a side job selling online courses, where email marketing is a crucial part of promoting the product. But much of this work is repetitive: segmenting email lists, creating templates, writing similar content, and then scheduling them to be sent in email marketing software.
Now, I hardly need to touch that tedious process anymore. Claude Cowork does it all for me. With an AI agent, you just need to say three simple words: 'Do it.' The AI not only writes emails but also automatically integrates them into the campaign system, selects the right audience, sets parameters, and then sends notifications for testing before scheduling the email to be sent.
When you start working with AI agents, you'll find your to-do list is processed significantly faster.
From 'doing work' to 'directing work'
This not only speeds up the work but also changes the nature of the job. The focus shifts from processing each task to focusing on results. You assign work to a team of 'digital employees,' then review what they've done.
In other words, you become the 'CEO of your own work'.
So what happens when the newsroom starts working this way?
Over the past 30 years, reporters and editors have had to learn how to use a multitude of different systems: project management software, CMS for publishing, SEO plugins, social media management platforms… the list just keeps getting longer. With AI agents, journalists can delegate all of that to the AI and focus on the more human aspects of their work, such as investigation and editing.
Things have become more sensitive as AI has begun to get involved in the writing process. This recently sparked controversy when The Plain Dealer—a major Cleveland-based newspaper—used an AI agent to write articles based on reporters' notes.
Articles are still edited and reporters still have the final say, but this approach raises many questions about employment, skills, and career paths.
Even without considering this specific case, it seems inevitable that AI agents will take over much of the content production and distribution process. From social media management and SEO to setting up information fields in CMS systems — all are tasks well-suited for AI.
This means that some job roles will gradually disappear.
AI is changing the value of content.
Over the years, as search engines and social media have become the primary sources of traffic, newsrooms have built processes around trends. Many roles have emerged with the task of writing trending articles and publishing content quickly to maximize clicks.
These tasks are primarily based on pre-existing formulas, optimized for algorithms, and driven by trends. In a context where AI can perform these tasks faster than humans, the value of this type of content will drastically decrease.
And this is also why AI can have a positive impact on journalism. AI will eliminate tasks that could be automated, leaving more important parts such as finding new information, providing perspectives, and conducting analysis.
If you build an AI-centric news site from scratch, roles will focus on tasks that only humans can do well. This includes building relationships with sources, conducting exclusive investigations, identifying compelling stories, and telling stories in an engaging way.
It sounds ideal, but the reality is that as AI handles the majority of tasks, the number of personnel may decrease. Organizations will become smaller, career paths will change, although the work may become more meaningful.
Current challenge: access and security
Currently, a major limitation is access. Tools like Claude Cowork are only truly powerful when they can access systems such as email, CMS, analytics data, or internal documents.
However, empowering AI also raises concerns about security and accountability. Therefore, many organizations still only allow AI to perform minor tasks or simply read data.
However, this may only be temporary. As protection mechanisms improve and people become more familiar with AI, the scope of AI agents will expand. When that happens, journalism will not lose its role. On the contrary, this role will become even more apparent.
A news site that prioritizes AI doesn't necessarily mean it's less human. In fact, it may be more human. While machines handle repetitive tasks, humans can focus on the most important aspects: building trust, finding new information, and explaining it to readers.
The worrying thing is that fewer people will do this job. But the hopeful thing is that the work itself will become more meaningful.