Now SQL has made some hindrances with restrictions - namely a rigid schema / schema, which makes them less suitable for other types of applications.
To meet the database needs, the service infrastructure and the continuous strategies offered by the developers have also changed dramatically. Easier and more affordable cloud technologies have emerged to replace complex and expensive servers. Or more engineers using speeding methods, aim to continuously develop and shorten the cycle, the purpose of querying data at a fast rate, meeting the needs of users.
And so, NoSQL was born to serve the requirements that match the current. The NoSQL system stores and manages data so that it can support high-speed operation and provide great flexibility for developers to use. Unlike SQL databases, many NoSQL databases can expand horizontally across hundreds or thousands of servers.
However, NoSQL system is not consistent data like SQL. In fact, SQL databases do not prioritize performance and scalability, but will often push compliance with ACID attributes to ensure reliability of transactions up front, while the NoSQL database is near. like ignoring the ACID guarantees to prioritize speed and scalability.
In summary, SQL and NoSQL have different trade-offs in their systems. Although both can compete in the context of a project, when placed in an overall picture, there is a supporting and complementary role. Determining which tools to choose depends on the nature of the actual work.
SQL Database NoSQL Database History Developed in the 1970s with the first wave of data storage applications. Developed in the 2000s to address the limitations of SQL databases, specifically related to scaling, scaling and archiving unstructured data. Database of MySQL, Postgres, Oracle Database MongoDB, Cassandra, HBase, and Neo4j data models Individual records (for example, "employees") are stored as rows in the table, with each column storing one specific data about that record (eg "manager", "rented date" .), like a spreadsheet. Separate data types are stored in separate tables and then joined together when more complex queries are executed. For example: "office" can be stored in a table and "employees" in another table. When the user wants to find the employee's working address, the database tool will join the "employee" and "office" tables together to get all the necessary information. Different based on NoSQL database type. For example, key-value stores operate similarly to SQL databases, but only two columns ("key-key" and "value-value"). Document database completely eliminates the table-and-row model, storing all the related data in a single "document" in JSON, XML or other formats, can nest values according to things. rank. Scalability Vertical, which means that the single server must be increasingly powerful to meet the expansion needs of the data. It is possible to extend the SQL database on multiple servers, but need to add important techniques. Horizontally, which means to add space, the database administrator only needs to add more servers or clouds. NoSQL database automatically disperses data on servers when necessary Open source Integrated Development Model (eg Postgres, MySQL) and closed source code (eg Oracle Database) Code Open source Manipulate specific language data using the Select, Insert, and Update statements.
With NoSQL, data can be stored in a no-schema or free-form manner. Any data can be stored in any record. Among the NoSQL databases, there are 4 popular data storage models, so there are 4 popular NoSQL system types: Document database, Key-value stores, Wide column stores and Graph database.
1. Document database (eg: CouchDB, MongoDB): Data is added to store as a free JSON structure or 'document', in which data can be any type, from integer to string or to free texts.
2. Key-value stores (eg Redis, Riak): Free-form values, from integers or simple strings to complex JSON documents, are accessed in the database by keys.
3. Wide column stores (eg: HBase, Cassandra): Data is stored in columns instead of rows as in a regular SQL system. Any number of columns (and therefore different types of data) can be grouped or aggregated when needed for a query or data view.
4. Graph database (example: Neo4j): Data is represented as a network or graph of entities and relationships of that entity, with each node in the diagram being a data block in the form of self by.
Removing schema data storage is useful in the following cases:
The structured query language used by traditional databases provides a unified way to communicate with the server when storing and retrieving data. The SQL syntax is highly standardized, so while individual databases can handle different operations, the basics are the same.
In contrast, each NoSQL database has its own syntax for querying and managing data. For example, CouchDB uses requests in the form of JSON, sent over HTTP, to create or retrieve documents from its database. MongoDB sends JSON objects via binary protocol, using command line interface or language library.
Some NoSQL tools can use SQL-like syntax to work with data, but only in limited scope. For example, Apache Cassandra, a database store like language of SQL - Cassandra query language (Cassandra Query Language - CQL). Some CQL syntax is out of SQL, like SELECT or INSERT keywords, but there is no way to implement JOIN or subquery in Cassandra.
A design choice of NoSQL system is non-shared architecture. In this type of architecture, each node in the cluster operates independently of all other nodes. The system does not need to receive consensus from each node to return data to customers. Queries are fast because they can be returned from the nearest or most convenient node.
Another advantage of 'Shared-nothing' is the ability to recover and scale up. Cluster expansion is as easy as rotating new nodes in the cluster and waiting for them to synchronize with other nodes. If a node in NoSQL fails, the other servers in the cluster will continue to operate, all data is still available to serve the requirements even if there are fewer nodes.
If NoSQL provides a lot of freedom and flexibility, why not give up completely SQL? The answer is simple: many applications still require the types of constraints, consistency, and protections that SQL databases provide. In those cases, some advantages on NoSQL's platform can be turned into blemishes.
Some other limitations stem from the fact that the NoSQL systems are quite 'fledgling', which may include some of the following disadvantages:
1. There is no schema
Even if you get data in free form, you almost always need to impose constraints to make it useful. With NoSQL, responsibility will be transferred from the database to the application developer. For example, a developer can impose a structure through a relational object map system or ORM. But if you want a self-data schema, NoSQL will not normally support it.
Some NoSQL solutions provide optional authentication and data entry mechanisms. For example, Apache Cassandra has a series of original data types similar to the data types found in regular SQL.
2. Lack of consistency
NoSQL trade-offs consistency to prioritize speed and performance more efficiently. Any data inserted into the cluster will be available throughout the system anyway, but it is not possible to know for sure.
Some NoSQL databases have mechanisms to fix this. For example, MongoDB, this system ensures consistency for individual operations, but not for the entire database. Microsoft Azure CosmosDB allows you to choose the consistency level for each request, so you can choose the behavior appropriate for your use case.
3. NoSQL lock-in
Most NoSQL systems are similar in concept, however, the implementation is very different. Each system will have its own data query and management mechanism. This may become a problem if system changes occur during the process.
For example, if you change the system from MongoDB to CouchDB you will have to do more than just move data. You must also navigate the difference in data access and how to program, in other words, you must rewrite parts of the database access application.
4. Young skills
Another limitation for NoSQL is that users may lack the relative professional skills. While the market for SQL is still growing, NoSQL is still very young because the system is still quite new and not everyone knows how to use it fluently.
According to Truth.com at the end of 2017, the volume of job listings for SQL, usually MySQL MySQL, Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle Database, . is higher than the total of three years with the workload for MongoDB, Couchbase and Cassandra. NoSQL's demand is growing, but it is still a small part of the market for SQL.
With its advantages, NoSQL becomes extremely suitable for the challenges of modern data storage. In addition, cost savings and time make NoSQL even more prominent than relational database solutions.
Typically, organizations will start with small-scale testing on a NoSQL database. Most of these databases are open source, meaning they can be downloaded, deployed and expanded at low cost.
Many organizations began to see significant advantages when using NoSQL databases for projects. Because the cycle grows faster, organizations can innovate faster and provide a superior customer experience at a lower cost. With these advantages, NoSQL is being used much in Big Data projects, Real-time projects, and a lot of data.
See more: